Changing Contours Of FIR

Think about an individual strolling all the way down to a police chowki and insisting to lodge an FIR (First Info Report) towards pilferage of commodities starting from Pajamas to orange, the yawning man in uniform posted within the chowki would get sufficient purpose to ludicrously snort on the complainer and subsequently, thrash him out of the station. Though, the legislation of land persists that police ought to register each single complain coming its means, in as we speak’s circumstance such petty crimes don’t get registered. A paradigm shift within the nature of crime over the time might be pointed to be the first purpose for it. Criminology has stooped to such vociferous ranges that even police need to take a tricky trip even to grasp the character of the crime.

To a terrific extent, FIRs are the candid portrayal of the character of the crime dedicated in a selected period, which in flip, narrates the prevalent social norms of the society to some extent. Headlines India takes you right into a chronological trip of assorted FIRs lodged in sporadic police stations(PS) of Delhi, ranging from the primary of its type.

The primary FIR of Delhi was lodged precisely 100 and forty-six years in the past, with Subzi Mandi Police Station on October 18, 1861. The FIRs at the moment have been written in Urdu and the justices have been delivered inside per week’s time. It reads as follows: “Utensils & Garments Theft”, FIR no and Part (unknown) below Police Station Subzi Mandi had lodged that one Maiyuddin son of Mohammad Yar Khan resident of Katra Sheesh Mahal said that 3 Degcha, 3 Degchi, a Katora, a Kulfi, a Hukka and a few women’ garments price 45 annas have been stolen from his home within the night time.

Different FIRs of that period:

Dated: February 16,1891.Criticism – “Theft Of 11 Oranges Price 2 Annas” FIR no-125, Part 379 IPC, below Subzi Mandi Police Station recorded that Ram Baksh s/o Allah Balsh alongside together with his 4-5 accomplices stole 11oranges of Ram Prasad s/o Deen Singh, the complainant caught him together with the oranges with the assistance of Chajju ram and was delivered to Police Station. The Court docket Verdict: 1 month RI (23-12-1891).

Dated: April 30, 1895.Criticism- “Theft of a Tattu (Mule)” FIR no- 44, Part 381 IPC below Subzi Mandi PS lodged that Moka s/o Nanwa complained his tattu was stolen by Fula Jat, who was his former servant. The Court docket Verdict: Untraced (16-05-1895).

Dated: March 10, 1897. Criticism- “Theft of Pyjamas Price 8 Annas” FIR no. 6, Part 36, 380 IPC below PS Subzi Mandi registered that the Pyjamas of Jyoti s/o Chuhe Mal was stolen by Ram Dayal Tufal s/o Kallu, when he was interrogated, he promised to convey it from residence however he didn’t flip up. Later he was arrested with Pyjamas. The courtroom Verdict: Awarded 5 lashes.(15-03-1897).

Dated: September 20, 1898.Criticism- “Theft Of Hukka Price Rs 5” FIR no- 6, Part 39, 379 IPC below Nangloi Police Station famous that Badlu, s/o Dana Jat reported, that he was mendacity on a charpai (cot) within the chaupal. Harnam got here and took away his Hukka. When he noticed him working, he ran after him and caught him after about 500 steps from chaupal. The Court docket verdict: 2 weeks R.I. (27-09-1898).

One other one lodged on October 18, 1894 after nearly 20 years – “Choose Pocket of 4 Annas” FIR no-125, Part 379 IPC, below Subzi Mandi Police Station registered that Tulsi, s/o Sabi Jat reported, that Harvender had taken out 4 annas from his pocket and was caught red-handed by Jeet. Online Quran learning The Court docket pronounced 2 years RI to the accused as he was a routine offender. The decision got here on December 19, 1894. Solely after one and half month, which is sort of paradoxical in as we speak’s authorized system which is prospering arduous for a quick justice supply system.

In one other incident Quran Classes Online on June 22, 1899, an FIR was lodged concerning theft of Quran Sharif. “Theft of Quran Sharif” FIR no 15, Part-380 IPC below PS Mehrauli recorded that Alladiya said that final night time Guttu arrived to the Mosque and instructed that he had been transformed to Muslim and wished to go to Ajmer Sharif, so he requested for assist. He was donated funds and meals. He stayed that night time on the Mosque and walked away with the Quran Sharif. Ultimately he was caught him from a store. The decision of 1 week of imprisonment was pronounced on July 12, 1899.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *